The Emergence of Neoliberal Policies and the Questioning of Contemporary Globalization
In an globalized world, the discourse on globalisation is regularly found at the intersection of divergent opinions on freedom and justice. The text by Moneta, far from being a critical essay opposed to globalisation per se, seeks to reinvent the limits of a new humanism by the filter of natural exchanges as envisioned by Aristotle. By decrying synthetic interactions that support current structures of injustice and instability, Moneta leans on ancient principles to highlight the gaps of our world economy.
Looking back in time, globalization is not a new phenomenon. Its roots can be identified back to the propositions of the economist Ricardo, whose goal was aimed at allowing the British Empire to expand its global commercial influence. Nonetheless, what was once a commercial development strategy has morphed into a control mechanism by global finance, symbolized by the rise of neoliberalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, Junon Moneta proves that the economic model is truly a structure based on old customs, which traces back to 4500 years.
The critique also covers the administration of the United Europe, considered as a chain of surrenders that have served to strengthen the authority of large economic groups as opposed to protecting the interests of its citizens. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its policies frequently driven by monetary concerns rather than by a democratic mandate, is questioned. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only reinforced the skepticism of Moneta regarding the EU’s ability to reform itself from within.
This thinker, while acknowledging the prior faults that have led to the current situation, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also offers responses aimed at reorienting European policies in a human-centered and fair vision. The urgency for a deep reform of structures and political priorities is a recurring subject that runs through the overall content.
The text delves more intensely into the questioning of the power structures that dominate worldwide transactions. The study covers the way in which governmental and economic orientations are influenced by a small group of dominant financial powers, often at the detriment of the population. This monetary aristocracy, orchestrated via entities like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the IMS, deploys a disproportionate influence on global financial decisions.
The author reveals how these organisms, under the pretext of economic supervision and normalization, have historically controlled financial markets and national economic systems to serve their interests. Deregulated capitalism, opposite to a liberating response to classic financial limitations, is presented as a control mechanism, enriching an elite at the expense of general well-being.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the analyst describes the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but as being a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The transition to the euro is viewed as a succession of bureaucratic measures that isolated populations from decision-making processes, while amplifying disparities between member countries within the EU.
The consequences of these policies manifest in the increase in national debts, economic stagnation, and a prolonged austerity that has weakened living conditions throughout Europe. The author emphasizes that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the European Union stays exposed to upcoming crises, potentially more destructive.
In summary, the manuscript demands a democratic uprising where European citizens reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It suggests fundamental changes, including greater transparency in political decisions and authentic democratic engagement that would allow Europe to rebuild on more equitable and sustainable bases.
Reference text about Plus de détails ici
The author suggests that the answer resides in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where decisions are made and applied in a way that truly reflects the aspirations and needs of the citizens, instead of the profits of the financial elite.